2013

Admiralty - Negligent navigation - Fishing vessel grounded - Coral reef scarred - Living coral destroyed - Vessel in shipping lane - No pilot available - Regulatory framework for operation in Kingston harbour - Authority for operation - The absence of a pilot - The pilot (waiver of compulsory pilotage) 1981 - Special skill or competence, Bolam v Friern Hospital Committee 1975, 2 A.E.R 118 - Compensation - Costs for coral reef restoration and rehabilitation – Capital and operational costs of coral reefs - Benefit loss approach - Comparative costs.

Sub-lease — Whether Monthly or a Tenancy for a Fixed Term — Argument at
Variance with Contract for a Lease — Subject to Contract — Suffieciency of
Memorandum — Frustration — Unjust Enrichment

Detinue — Measure of Damages — Market value at the time of seizure - The Attorney General & Anor v Aston Burey - Loss of use- Loss of trade goods.

Land - Registration of Titles Act – Limitation of Actions Act – Whether first registration defeats a possessory title – Whether a subsequent transfer also defeats possessory title.

Application for disproportionate division of property under section 13 & 14 of the Property (Rights Of Spouses) Act – Factors to be taken into account - Whether Court’s jurisdiction grounded in section 11 of PROSA – Whether the law of equity and trust applicable.

Negligence- Motor vehicle collision- 1st Defendant exiting premises – 2nd and 3rd Defendant overtaking a line of vehicles with flasher and siren on - Claimants passengers - Liability- Contributary Negligence – Damages.

Land – Claimant transferred his share to others – Purpose of transfer was so that creditors could not go after family home – Whether Claimant still has beneficial interest in the property.

Land – Owners hold as tenants in common – 2nd Defendant is part owner in possession who made improvements – Property sold - Whether proceeds of sale to be divided in accordance with an agreement between the co-owners - Whether claim barred by Limitation of Actions Act - Whether one co-owner’s investment in the land bars recovery of equal share by the other co-owners.