Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Cabletron Network Systems Limited v Maud Interconnect Systems Limited and Home Time Entertainment Limited

Injunction - Application for Interim Injunction pursuant to Section 49(h) of the Judicature (Supreme Court) Act - Rules 17.1(a), 17.1(4) and 17.2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2002 - Whether there is a serious issue to be tried – Whether damages an adequate remedy - Balance of convenience - Preservation of status quo.

Rowe, James v Rowe, Elaine and Roydell Thompson

Sections 174, 178, and 179 of the Companies Act - Whether the Claimant is entitled to a re-transfer of his shareholdings in the company - Whether a resulting trust was created in favour of the Claimant - Whether the presumption of advancement is displaced - Whether the removal of the Claimant as director is valid - Whether the appointment of the 1st and 2nd Defendants as directors of the company is valid

Knott, Aleisha v Myrie, Copeland

Breach of Contract - Whether the Defendant is liable for failing to complete the modification of the unfinished building - Whether the Claimant breached the contract for failing to pay the Defendant in a timely manner - Whether the Defendant is in breach of the contract for leaving the work site - Whether the Defendant should be compensated for additional works.

Subscribe to The Hon. Mrs. Justice Stephane Jackson-Haisley