The Hon. Mrs. Andrea Pettigrew-Collins

Application to stay or set aside order - Rule 18.11 - Rule 39.6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Application to strike out inadmissible affidavit evidence - Rule against hearsay - Rule 30.3 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Constitutional Law – Whether breach of constitutional rights – Right to equitable and humane treatment by public authority – Right to enjoy healthy and productive environment – Right to protection from torture, or inhuman or degrading punishment – Whether claimant provided with access to life-saving food and medication, meals and medication in a timely manner and adequate access to medical and dental care.

Whether claimant acquired right to possessory title over land – whether claimant
entered onto land by consent - Whether land purchased by defendants properly
identified on ground – whether title to land obtained by fraud – Whether lands part
of estate of deceased.

Constitutional claim - Application for constitutional relief - Breach of Fundamental Rights and Freedom - Right to protection of property from compulsory acquisition - S.

Whether the claimant has acquired rights to a possessory title to the disputed
parcels of land - Whether title fraudulently transferred to the Defendants - Whether
Claimant or defendants entitled to damages for trespass or mesne profits.

Negligence – Whether breach of duty of care- whether damage or injury to claimant – Whether claimant can rely on particulars of negligence not pleaded –Rule 8.9A of the Civil Procedure Rules – Whether doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applicable – Inevitable accident.

Civil Practice - Whether order irregular - Whether judge had jurisdiction to make order - Whether Judge of concurrent jurisdiction has the authority to set aside another judge’s order.

Motor Vehicle Accident - Negligence - Causation - Contributory negligence- Ancillary claim - Contribution - Assessment of Damages.

Whether claimant authorized to initiate proceedings by himself - Whether Agreement for Sale between deceased and defendant remained a valid agreement - Whether counterclaim statute barred - Whether executor should be made to transfer property to defendant - Whether executor entitled to mesne profit - Whether executor estopped from seeking recovery of possession.