The Hon. Mr. Justice David Batts

Companies Act - Sections 174,193, 213 and 213A - Mining lease granted to 1st Defendant’s son - Duty of director – Whether breach of trust - Whether implicit agreement to permit 1st Defendant to make such a decision - Whether 1st Defendant as managing director acted lawfully - Whether duty to disclose - Whether secret profit – Expert report admitted by consent - Whether Defendants entitled to challenge the expert’s methods and findings – Remedies - Measure of damages.

Company Law – Minority shareholder – Section 213A Companies Act – Civil Practice and Procedure – Rule 15.2 – Defendant’s application for Summary Judgment – Whether Defendant can obtain Summary Judgment against itself – Whether Claimant entitled to a trial – Whether trial of preliminary issue is appropriate - Anton Pillar order improperly executed – Mareva injunction- Whether orders to be set aside – Whether an order for interim payment should be made – Whether interim receiver should be appointed.

Judicial Review – Renewed application for leave – Whether Respondent has power to arrest and charge - Whether “designated “ constable under FIDA has power to arrest and charge- Whether Informations void - Whether alternate remedy available in the parish court – Whether Fiat to prosecute should be set aside - Costs.

Application for Injunction to restrain recovery of debt - Letters of Commitment – Loan Facility secured by Bills of Sale and Mortgages – Whether real issues for trial- Whether damages an adequate remedy – Application of Marbella principles.

Application for Request for Judgment – Unless Order - Non compliance-Application for Relief from Sanctions- Whether relief to be granted.

Constitutional law - Judicial Review - Decision to terminate licence - Whether municipal authority correctly terminated a licence to use premises - Whether interim injunction to be granted - Freedom of expression.

Contract - Whether for sale of goods or on consignment - Unsold goods - Whether promise to purchase unsold goods - Whether duty of care to safely pack before shipping and return - Whether duty discharged by retaining a shipping agent.

Trial in Chambers — No dispute of facts — Performance Bond — Defendant not a
party to the Performance Bond — Defendant provided title to land as security for
the Performance Bond — Whether deposit of title created equitable mortgage.

Contract - Terms of contract - Tender and successful bid - Duty of defendant- Whether implied duty to certify suitability of  laimant’s equipment - Claimant failed to meet targets - Whether failure due to inadequate equipment - Counter claim – Measure of damages.