Contract - Variations - Whether work done - Evidence by video link - Whether witness to affirm..

Application for Summary Judgment - Whether Defence has real prospect of success – Loan - Guarantee and Indemnity - Whether misrepresentation about time of disbursement – Application post dates misrepresentation - Whether guarantor‟s error exculpatory.

Application for payment of money held as security - Injunction discharged - Whether undertaking as to damages implied – Whether damage or loss is to be set off against money held as security – Foreclosure – Whether mortgagor entitled to refund of money held as security.

Application for Summary Judgment - No dispute of fact – Whether Guarantor who signed as director of principal borrower privy to change of contract agreement – Whether liable in his capacity as Guarantor – Whether Consumer Protection Act applicable.

Striking Out – Application by First Defendant – Further, Further Amended Particulars of Claim- No leave to file obtained - Whether new cause of action – Whether Limitation bar- CPR Rules 20.4; 26.3 and 26.9.

Probate  Executrix overseas-Locus standi to bring claim –Affidavit evidence- Whether hearsay and inadmissible- Whether equitable mortgage valid –Whether promissory note enforceable-Interpretation of promissory note-Whether “on or before” sufficiently certain- Whether promise made by testator prior to his death enforceable against estate – Whether debt discharged –Whether equitable mortgage enforceable against non-parties to the loan- Whether equitable mortgagors estopped- Undertaking-Whether attorney at law in breach.

Negligence – Motor vehicle collision –Whether claim to be dismissed because 3rd Defendant’s driver pled guilty in the traffic court- 1st Defendant turning –Duty of turning driver- Duty of overtaking driver- Damages – Fractures, whiplash ,3% PPD.

Negligence- Motor Vehicle Accident – U-Turn on major thoroughfare – Whether Passing Vehicle at Fault – Damages – Muscular ligament – Splinters in Eyes – abdominal pain.

Matrimonial Property – Relationship commenced when parties were 16 and 18
years old respectively - Both participated In development of a pharmaceutical
business – Company – Unequal number of shares - Property purchased In
Husband’s sole name- Funds from company used to purchase property -
Common intention - Whether property beneficially owned jointly in equal shares.

Negligence – Motor vehicle colliding with pedal cyclist -  Issues of Fact – Whether Condition of road caused accident - Whether Defendant breached duty of care to Claimant.