Personal injury claim – Whether claimant should be permitted to amplify his witness statement under CPR 29.1 (a) – Whether claimant permitted to rely on documents not previously disclosed - Whether claimant has proven breach of duty under the Occupiers’ Liability Act- Whether causal connection between injury and alleged breach of duty.

Civil Practice and Procedure – Application to Set Aside Default Judgment – CPR Rule 13.3 – Whether or not the Defendants have a Defence with a Real Prospect of Success

Recovery of Possession – Adverse Possession – Sections 3, 4(a) and 30 of the
Limitation of Actions Act – Whether or not the Claimant’s Title has been
Extinguished – Whether or not the 1st and 2nd Defendants were in sole, exclusive
occupation of the property.

Civil Practice and Procedure – Application for Summary Judgment – Whether the
Defendant has a Defence With a Real Prospect of Success in Whole or in Part
Concerning Whether or not the Claimant was Involved in the collision or injured
in the Collision

Civil Practice and Procedure – Application to Set Aside Default Judgment Entered on a Counterclaim – CPR Rule 13.3 – Whether or not the Claimant has a good explanation for failure to comply with the CPR to File a Defence to the Counterclaim – Whether or not the Claimant has made the appropriate application – Should they have applied for relief from sanction or whether it should have been an application to set aside default judgment – Whether or not the Claimant has a Defence with a Real Prospect of Success.

Civil Procedure & Practice –– Contract Law –– Breach of Contract –– Elements of a Contract –– Specific Performance – Proprietary Estoppel – Possessory Title - Unjust Enrichment –– Absence of Documentary Evidence –– Sale Agreement.

Recovery of Possession –– Letters of Administration –– Claim for mesne profits

Civil Practice and Procedure – Application to Amend Defence – Late Stage Amendment – Whether Amendment to Defence Permissible – Principles Applicable to Late Stage Amendment - Commencement of Action – Filing of Claim Form – Rule 8.1 – When is a Claim Commenced – Whether Date for Commencement of Action can be extended under rule 3.2(5).

Judicial Review – Employment – Unjustifiable dismissal not challenged – Compensatory Award challenged for being Wednesbury unreasonable – Failure of IDT to consider all relevant factors – Parity with previous awards absent from findings and not considered – Award irrational.

Judicial Review - Application for leave – Insurance intermediary company – Registration cancelled – Whether the decision was unreasonable, unjust or ultra vires - Delay - Part 56 Civil Procedure Rules - The Insurance Act, sections 2, 77.