2017

False Imprisonment  Malicious Prosecutions- Assessment of Damages- Aggravated Damages- Exemplary or Vindicatory Damages.

NEGLIGENCE – VICARIOUS LIABILITY - WHETHER EMPLOYEE OF OWNER ACTING WITHIN COURSE OF HIS EMPLOYMENT - CLOSE CONNECTION TEST

Constitutional Law – Claim for breach of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms – Freedom of Expression – Freedom of Thought and Conscience – Expert Witness – Expert Report – Whether breach of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms is demonstrably Justified in a Free and Democratic Society – Breach of Employment Contract – Payment in Lieu of Notice – Stigma and Reputational Harm – Loss of Advantage on the Labour Market – Breach of Implied Term of Trust and Confidence – Defamation – Damages – Aggravated Damages – Constitutional and Vindicatory Damages.

MARRIAGE - CAPACITY TO CONSENT TO MARRIAGE –– EXPERT EVIDENCE - EVIDENCE OF CAREGIVER – FALSE IMPRISONMENT – BREACH OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS – RETURN OF MONEY PAID TO SPOUSE OF CLAIMANT - MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT SECTION 4

Burden of proof – Equity – Resulting trust – Constructive trust.

Application for interim declaration and injunctions

Equity – Constructive Trust – Division of Property – Beneficial interest in properties – Unmarried couple – Common intention – Requirement of detriment

Evidence - Whether requirements in respect of computer generated documents applies equally to information derived from a computer contained in a witness statement which stands as evidence in chief - Evidence Act sections 31E and 31G

Motor Vehicle – Personal Injury – Laceration – Tenderness to Chest – Quantum – Whether Special Damages Should Be Awarded Where No Proof Given

FIXED DATE CLAIM FORM PROCEEDINGS – UNDEFENDED CLAIM – JUDGMENT ENTERED IN FAVOUR OF CLAIMANT – APPLICATION FOR STAY OR EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT – RISK OF INJUSTICE – WHETHER DEFENDANT’S APPEAL HAS ANY PROSPECT OF SUCCESS – WHETHER DECLARATORY ORDERS CAN BE STAYED – WHETHER PERMISSIVE JUDGMENT ORDERS CAN PROPERLY BE SUBJECT TO A STAY OF EXECUTION ORDER – WHETHER JUDGMENT ORDER REQUIRING ACT TO BE DONE BY AN UNSPECIFIED DATE CAN BE MADE SUBJECT TO A STAY OF EXECUTION ORDER – NEED TO COMPLY WITH CASE MANAGEMENT TIMELINES SET BY COURT – NEED TO FILE DEFENCE AND PROPERLY BE DEFENDING CLAIM IN ORDE