Lee, Wendy, Martin Hopwood and Anne Hopwood et al v Attorney General et al
Constitutional law — Challenge to the environmental permit granted by the Minister
of Economic Growth and Job Creation — NRCA refuses environmental permit —
Forestry Department objects — Right to enjoy a healthy and productive
environment likely to be breached — Right to property — Oakes Test —
Comparative Law — International instruments — Decision of Minister and
Environmental Permit struck down as unconstitutional - Declarations — Injunction
The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment)
Mason, Tamara v Davian Holland
Negligence - Liability for motor vehicle collision - Assessment of Damages
Munroe, Lavern v Christopher Lawrence
ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES - Negligence - Personal Injury caused by animal
Wallace-Cohen, Alicia v Jamaica Broilers Group Ltd
Tort – Negligence – Breach of Occupiers Liability Act – Whether Defendant is Liable for the Claimant Slipping and Falling on their premises. Tort – Negligence – Employer’s Liability – Whether Defendant Breached their Duty of Care to the Claimant as her Employer.
Hardware & Lumber Ltd v Commissioner of Customs
Revenue Procedure - Revenue Court Rules 1972 - jurisdiction of the court - Rule 12 - amendment to statement of case - Considerations on applications to amend statements of case - Rule 32 - Considerations on applications to extend time - Application to extend time to file documents giving rise to appeal and submissions - Rule 40 - applicability of CPR 26.7(1) and CPR sanctioning regime
Re: Gordon Arthur Cyril Stewart and the Companies Act and the Trusts Act
Civil Procedure - Application to strike out claim – Public Accountancy Act - Appointment of foreign accountant - Trusts Act - Whether applicable to executors - Whether the claim discloses reasonable grounds to bring the action - The Civil Procedure Rules 26.3 (1) (c).
Hall, Rohan v Minister of National Security
JUDICIAL REVIEW – Denial of application for Firearm User’s Licence – Whether administrative delay was unreasonable and/or irrational and amounted to procedural unfairness – Whether Claimant’s right to be heard was breached contrary to principles of natural justice – Whether certiorari and mandamus should be granted – Whether the Firearms (Prohibition, Restriction and Regulation) Act, 2022 applies retrospectively – Firearms Act, sections 37 and 37A – Interpretation Act, section 25(2)(c) and (e) – Part 56, Civil Procedure Rules (CPR).