LIVE STREAM: Call to the Bar Ceremony


Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

2019

Harley, Doreen v Harley, Norman and Jamaica Redevelopment Foundation Inc.

Civil Procedure - Joinder of party – Whether mortgagee should be joined on an application to restrain the registrar of lands from registering an order foreclosure.

Statutory Interpretation – Whether there is a requirement under section 119 of the Registration of Titles Act for a caveator claiming a beneficial interest to be served with a notice of intention to make an application for foreclosure – Whether there is a requirement for such a notice if the caveat is based on a beneficial interest awarded by the court.

Salmon, Marsha v Scott, Neville

Civil Practice and Procedure - Oral application to strike out claimant’s statement of case for breach of order of the Court - Rule 26.3 (1) (a) of the Civil Procedure Rules - The Property (Rights of Spouses) Act - Extension of time not sought or granted before the claim was filed - Validity of the claim.

Francis, Avadawn v Malcome Audley et al

Civil Practice and ProcedureNotice of Application to set aside Default Judgment - Rule 13. 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules - Principles to be applied in setting aside a Default Judgment.

Boswell, Horace v Johnson, Jennifer

Equity – Constructive and resulting trusts – Tenants in common – Whether the claimant is entitled to a greater interest in land than that endorsed on registered title

Sadler, Canute v Thompson, Dereick Michael et al

Civil Practice and Procedure - Costs - Default Costs Certificate obtained against the Defendants - Defendants’ Notice of Application to set aside Default Costs Certificate - Rule 65.22 of the Civil Procedure Rules - Factors the Court should consider in setting aside Default Costs Certificate.

Imperial Suites Hotel Limited v Johnson, Leroy

Application for striking out of Defence and/or Summary Judgment – Whether there exists reasonable grounds for defending the claim pursuant to rule 26.3(1)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules or a real prospect of successfully defending the claim pursuant to rule 15.2(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules – Defendant lacking locus standi as either shareholder or creditor of company to defend action on behalf of company – The company was the mortgagor and has a separate legal personality – Only the company has the legal standing to challenge the transfer of title pursuant to mortgagee’s power of sale –

Davis, Devon Mark v Marajah, Karen

Civil Practice and ProcedureNotice of Application to file Defence and Counterclaim out of time - Rules 10.3 (1), 10.3 (9), and 26.1 (2) (c) of the Civil Procedure Rules - Factors to be considered by the Court in deciding whether to grant an extension of time.

Pages

Covid-19

Emergency Matters

Emergency Matters

Matrimonial Proceedings

Customer Service

customer complaints image

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan for the Jamaican Judiciary 2024-2028