2010

GENERAL DAMAGES - LOSS OF FUTURE EARNINGS -

MULTIPLICAND/MULTIPLIER, HANDICAP ON THE

LABOUR MARKET- COST OF FUTURE MEDICAL CARE -

FUTURE COST OF HELP - OVERTIME PAYMENTS

Fire Brignde-Breach of stnt~itoryd uty- Wlzetlzer 0 civil right of action is

conferred or1 tlze clninznnts- Wlzetlzerfjre brigade crzjoys sti~t~~tory

inznzunip-Mennirzg of borzn fide-Neglige~qce -Wl?etlzer C / L L [ ~ qf care owed

/131 t11ef;re brigade- Vicarious liabilitj1- Fire Brignde Act ss (5) (10) (11)

(I 5)-Fire Brigarle Regulatiorzs ss (33) (3 7).

Although the court is notoriously slow to exercise its power to strike out a

statement of case, where the pleaded defence allege the claims to be statute barred,

in the absence of a reply averring an exception to the operation of the statute/ the

court, in giving effect to the overridng objective of the CPR, will be constraimd to

strike out the statement of case.

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW-ORDER OF CERTIORARI

AND PROHIBITION-STA Y OF EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS- WHETHER AUTHORIN TO

PROCEED UNLAWFULLY ISSUED-ALLEGATIONS OF INTERFERENCE WITH MINISTER'S

DISCRETION-WHETHER APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IS PREMATURE.

Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act - Unjustifiable dismissal - Duties and powers of the IDT - Application for certiorari - Whether IDT to enquire into the reason for the dismissal or the dismissal itself - Whether IDT fell into error of law - Relationship between employer's internal disciplinary procedures and the IDT.

Civil Practice - Pre-Claim Applicatiion for discovery - Whether Court has the

jurisdiction to grant - Whether party required to disclose may claim privilege that

disclosure may incriminate them - Principles guiding court- CPR rr. 8.1, 11.12, 17.1,

17.2,2!5.1, 27.9,28.6

CONTRACT - CONTRACT TO PURCHASE SHARES - AGREEMENT

EMBODIED IN COURT ORDER - PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE

ORDER - WHETHER CONTRACT FRUSTRATED - WHETHER

PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT MAKES IT FUNDAMENTALLY

DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IT WAS WHEN MADE - MISTAKE,

COMMON, MUlWAL AND EQUITABLE - EFFECT OF AGREEING THAT

THIRD PARTY VALUE SHARES

APPLICATION TO SET ASIbE GRANT OF LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL

REVIEW - WHETHER COURT HAS POWER - RULES 11.16 (I), (2), (3), 11.18 (I),

(2), (3), 56.4 (1 2), 56.6 (1) - EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPLY FOR LEAVE FOR

JUDICIAL REVIEW