Civil Procedure – Civil Procedure Rules - Summary Judgment – Agreement for Sale – Notice to Complete – Vacant Possession – Rescission of Agreement – Whether Agreement Completed by Delivery of Bank Undertaking for Payment of Purchase Price and Costs – Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) 2002, R. 15.6, 10.5, 26.3(1)(b) and (c), 64.6 and 64.6(4)(d).

Medical Negligence - Expert reports – Whether the Claimant has established breach of the duty of care.

Constitutional law - Assessment of Damages for unlawful detention of 2,504 days - Failure of machinery for timely appellate review - No record of appeal produced - Claimant served six years eight months in excess of sentence as a result - Due process rights breached - Privy Council remits for rehearing on sentence - Tapered rate - Vindicatory damages awardes. 

Negligence - Collision between pedestrian and motor vehicle - Contributory negligence - Duty of care - Liability - Quantum of damages. 

Real Property - Severance of joint tenancy - Beneficial interest. 

Probate - Civil Procedure Rules, R. 64.6(2) (3) and (4) - Claim by executors to be released - Application for joinder refused by Court - Costs – Whether the appropriate costs order should be no order as to costs or costs to be paid out of the estate - Special costs certificate.

Bail - Appeal from decision of Parish Court.

Matrimonial Property - Division of Matrimonial Property – Whether the Equal Share Rule should be applied – Property Rights of Spouses Act

Civil procedure – Breach of Contract - The Banking Services Act, The Consumer Protection Act - Whether the conduct and representations of the Claimant amount to negligence, negligent misstatement and/or breach of the implied duty of care and skill - Failure to exercise due diligence - Indemnity clauses - Implied terms in a contract - Unjust enrichment - Whether the Claimant is estopped from recovering the sums lost.

rust – Disputed property ownership – Whether the legal ownership of the Fort Charles property registered in the joint names of the claimant and the defendant is held on trust for the claimant - Whether the claimant intended to make a gift of purchase of half share in the property to the defendant – Whether legal ownership of the Toyota Wish Motor car registered in the joint names of the claimant and the defendant is held on trust for the claimant - Whether the claimant intended to make a gift of purchase of half share in the Toyota Wish Motor car to the defendant – Presumption of resulting