CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR UNLAWFUL DETENTION OF 2,504 DAYS – FAILURE OF MACHINERY FOR TIMELY APPELLATE REVIEW – NO RECORD OF APPEAL PRODUCED - CLAIMANT SERVED SIX YEARS EIGHT MONTHS IN EXCESS OF SENTENCE AS A RESULT – DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BREACHED – PRIVY COUNCIL REMITS FOR REHEARING ON SENTENCE – TAPERED RATE – VINDICATORY DAMAGES AWARDED

NEGLIGENCE - POLICE FATAL SHOOTING – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT – GUNSHOT RESIDUE – MEDICAL TRAJECTORY EVIDENCE – POSITION OF WOUND – CREDIBILITY– INCONSISTENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES – SELF DEFENCE –EXECUTION OF DUTY

JUDICIAL REVIEW  Refusal of Commissioner of Police to re-enlist Constable  Whether the Commissioner erred by considering Orderly Room convictions  Whether there was a failure to disclose adverse reports  Whether procedural fairness was denied by issuing a notice of refusal to re-enlist before the in-person hearing  Whether the Commissioner exceeded his jurisdiction by dismissing the claimant without an enquiry under Regulation 47 into alleged absence from duty

CONSTITUTIONAL RELIEF  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  CHAIN OF CUSTODY  NO CASE SUBMISSION UPHELD  PROSECUTION’S CASE MADE OUT ON EVIDENCE  PROPER CASE TO LAY BEFORE THE COURT DESPITE FINDING OF PARISH COURT

NEGLIGENCE  MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION NO PROPER LOOKOUT  BURDEN OF PROOF  CAUSATION  LIABILITY  PERSONAL INJURIES  QUANTUM

Civil procedure – Application for leave to appeal – Application for stay of execution

JURISDICTION OF THE COURT – VALIDITY OF CLAIM FORM – EFFECT OF APPLICATION – TWELVE MONTH EXTENSION IN SINGLE APPLICATION – CLAIM FORM DECLARED NULLITY

NEGLIGENCE - High School student injured by another in the presence of a teacher in class  Teacher failed to intervene - Breach of Duty – Occupiers’ Liability Act pleaded in the alternative

Civil Procedure – Application for extension of time to file Application for Leave to Appeal - Application for Leave to Appeal – Whether Court had jurisdiction to grant summary judgment to party without application – Whether Court improperly exercised jurisdiction to award costs against unsuccessful litigant in matter having a public interest – Application for stay of proceedings – Court of Appeal Rules [2002] (the CAR) – The Court of Appeal Amendment Rules [2025] Rule 1.8 (2) – The Court of Appeal Rules [2002], Rule 1.8(1), Rule 1.8 (7) – Bills of Exchange Act (BEA), S.

JUDICIAL REVIEW – Industrial Dispute - Unjustifiable dismissal/Termination on basis of redundancy - Discretion of the Minister to refer a dispute to IDT as per Section 11(1)(a) - Whether the Minister's decision to refer the Affected Party’s dispute to IDT was irrational based on the information before him - Whether the dispute is barred from litigation by virtue of a signed waiver to waive future claims arising from the said termination/dismissal.