Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Latest Updates:

Weir, Owayne v Dwayne Williams

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Claimant’s failure to file and serve witness statement and list of documents within the relevant time - Rules 29.11 and 28.14 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) - Application for relief from sanctions - Whether the relevant witness statement and list of documents were filed and served within time as prescribed or whether any sanction applies, and if so, what sanction applies - Whether the application for relief was filed promptly - Whether the application for relief, filed, is supported by evidence on affidavit - Whether the failure was unintentional - Wh

Rex v Gordin, Christopher

Criminal Law - Change/Withdrawal of Plea – Principles arising from R v Dodd (1981) 74 Cr App R 50 and summarised in Shadrach Momah v R [2011] JMCA Crim 54 – Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to allow an accused to change his plea of guilty to one of not guilty

Levy, John and Wilkinson, Courtney v Chambers, Gerald and Gordon Shirley et al

Injunction - Application for interim injunctive relief – Application to strike out or stay claim and for disclosure – Whether consent judgment entered in St. Lucia dispositive of claim – Whether Defendants to be restrained from treating with company assets - Whether valuation done in St Lucia fair - Whether misrepresentation or fraud - Whether failure to answer valuer’s requisitions ground for complaint - Whether issues more appropriately litigated in St Lucia.

Stewart, Adam v Stewart Robert, Dmitri Smith, Elizabeth Desnoes, Laurence McDonald and Gorstew Limited

Interlocutory injunction - Estate Gordon 'Butch' Stewart - Testator devised company shares and assets giving detailed instructions to executors - Directors meeting called - Whether a director and beneficiary has locus standi to prevent the directors meeting - Section 213A Companies Act - Whether anticipated oppressive act can be restrained. 

Graham, Caliston v Coast to Coast Quarries Limited, Coast to Coast Concrete Company Limited, Clifton Johnson and Shelly Ann Simpson et al

Company Law - Section 213A Companies Act - Whether there are instances of mismanagement of the 1st and 2nd Defendants - Whether the Claimant is entitled to recover funds invested in the 1st and 2nd Defendants - Whether the allegations of fraud have been proven - Whether the affairs of the 1st and 2nd Defendants have been conducted in an oppressive and/or unfairly prejudicial manner - Whether the Claimant was improperly removed as shareholder- Appropriate remedies - Winding-up - Investigation - Buyout.

Subscribe to 2025

Announcements

Announcement

 

 

 

Covid-19 Icon

Customer Complaints

customer complaints image

Emergency Matters

Emergency Matters

Matrimonial Proceedings

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan for the Jamaican Judiciary 2024-2028