CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – The Constitution of Jamaica – Section 13, 19, & 20 of The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment) Act, 2011 – Whether the Claimant has locus standi – Whether the States of Public Emergency were imposed for a proper purpose within the meaning of Section 20 of the Constitution – Whether the imposition of States of Public Emergency was reasonably justifiable – Whether the imposition of States of Public Emergency was demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society – Whether the imposition of States of Public Emergency breached the

Pensions - The Pensions (Superannuation Funds and Retirement Schemes) Act, 2006 – Section 27(2)(b) – Section 27(4) – Whether requirement of 90 days’ notice of an intention to wind up is mandatory – Whether failure to give 90 days’ notice renders notification void – Whether regulator’s jurisdiction to give approval affected – Whether notice may be varied or time within which to consider extended – Whether declaration should have a prospective effect.

Family law - Return of child - The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 - Articke 3, 11, 12 & 13 - The Children (Guardianship and Custody) (Amendment) Act - Whether the Court should exercise jurisdiction under the Hague Convention - Claimant initiating proceedings for custody - Acceptance of Court's jurisdiction to provide relief - Forum shopping - Habitial residence - Versal agreement - Consent or acquiescence - Whether unlawful retention - Discretion after one year.

Civil Procedure - Application for extension of time to apply to appeal decision and for leave to appeal decision of the Revenue Court.

Property Law - Contract for Sale of land – Unless order for delivery of title – Whether title with a three metre road reservation complied with order – Counter claim for trespass and breach of contract – Whether damages pleaded or proved – Judgment unenforceable until agreement stamped.

Costs - CPR Rules 64 and 65 – Interlocutory injunction refused – Whether costs should be reserved – Whether there is a general or “normal” rule – Whether decision of English Court of Appeal binding – Whether taxation should be immediate. 

Civil procedure – Striking out – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – The approach of the court in dealing with an application to strike out – Whether the claimant has sufficiently particularized the claim – Whether the claimant’s statement of case as framed constitutes an abuse of the process of the court – Whether the claimant’s statement of case is prolix, frivolous and vexatious and without merit – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the

Civil Procedure - Application for Summary Judgment - Whether Defence and Counterclaim have a real prospect of success – Whether Defence to be struck out for not disclosing reasonable grounds to defend the claim - Civil Procedure Rules 15. 2 and 26.3

CIVIL PROCEDURE - Application by the claimant for summary judgment against the defendant and/or to strike out the defendant’s defence - Whether summary judgment should be granted in favour of the claimant against the defendant in light of the orders sought in the claimant’s claim form and particulars of claim, which were filed on September 1, 2022 - Whether the defendant’s defence, which was filed on October 27, 2022, should be struck out - Application by the defendant to strike out the claimant’s statement of case or, alternatively, for summary judgment in favour of the defendant - Wh

NEGLIGENCE - Employers Liability - Duty to Provide Adequate Plant and Equipment - Safe System of Work - Whether adequate training provided - Whether the Defendant is liable.