Richards,Lorenzo v United Car Rentals Ltd, etal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C.L. 225 OF 1992
IN CHAMBERS
BETWEEN
AND
AND
LORENZO RICHARDS PLAINT IFF
UNITED CAR RENTALS LTD. lST DEFENDANT
OSMOND BERNARD zND DEFENDANT
No appearance for plaintiff
-
Miss Alicia Richards instructed by -~essrs.D unn,
Cox for the first defendant
Heard July 3, 2002 and July 12, 2002
APPLICATION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Sykes J (Ag)
This is yet another of the now many cases coming
Hylton,Charlton v Centennial Digital Jamaica Ltd
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JLTDICATLRE OFJAMAICA
IN EQUITY
SUIT NO. 166 OF 2002
BETWEEN CHARLTON HYLTON PLAINTIFF
AND CENTENNIAL DIGITAL JAMAICA LIMITED DEFENDANT
Mr. Ian Wilkinson and Miss Shawn Steadman for Plaintiff
Mr. Harold Brady for Defendant
Heard: April 3,4and April 11,2002
Sykes J (Ag)
It is 2002. Cellular telephones are ubiquitous. They are in the hands of princes and
paupers. The market appears to be lucrative. The defendant (a registered company in
Henry, Dorothy v Superior Plastics Ltd
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C.L. H-104 OF 1994
BETWEEN
AND
DOROTHY HENRY
SUPERIOR PLASTICS LIMITED
PLAINT IFF
DEFENDANT
C;, Mr. Clyde William instructed by Haughton & Associates for
plaintiff
-
Mr. Debayo Adidepe for defendant
May 13, 14, 16 and June 6, 2002
Sykes J (Ag)
November 20, 1991 will live long in the memory of the
plaintiff. That was the day on which she was injured at her
place of work, Superior Plastics Limited, located in
Mossel (Jamaica) Limited v Cable and Wireless Jamaica Limited et al
Statutory interpretation – Sections 29, 31, 32 and 34 of Telecommunications Act – Interpretation of contract.
Holness, Duke and Holness, Suzanna v Palmyra Resort and Spa Ltd (In receivership) and Palmyra Properties Ltd. (In receivership)
Company law – Receivership - Whether directors need leave to apply to set aside default judgment – Derivative action - Whether directors should indemnify company and on what terms.
Regina v Stewart, Joseph
Appeal - Appeal from refusal by Resident Magistrate - Principles applicable - Reasons for refusal
3M Company v Manufacturera 3M. S.A. de C.V. and Registrar of Industrial Property
Trade mark – Registration of Trade Mark – Appeal from decision of Registrar – Sections 2, 10, 11, 13, 14, 43 of Trade Marks Act, 2001 – Trade Mark Rules - Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 of First Council Directive on Trade Marks of December 21, 1988, No. 89/104.
Stewart, Joseph v Regina
Appeal - Bail appeal from refusal by Resident Magistrate - Principles applicable - Reasons for refusal