Locksley Francis v The Attorney General et al
IN THE SWREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
CLAIM NO. C.L. F036 of 2001
BETWEEN LOCKSLEY FRANCIS CLAIMANT
AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 ST DEFENDANT
AND
IAN YOLNG
AND JOSEPH DAVIS
2ND DEFENDANT
3RD DEFENDANT
Mr. Lawrence Haynes for the Claimant
Miss Katherine Francis and Miss A. Richards instructed by Director of State
Proceedings for the Defendants.
HEARD: 5th February, 29th, 3oth March and 9'h November, 2004
G. SMITH, J.
Portmore Citizens Advisory Council & Portmore Joint Citizens Association v Ministry of Transport and Works, The Attorney General of Jamaica
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAIC
CLAIM NO. HCV 1085 OF 2005
BETWEEN PORTMORE CITIZENS 1 CLAIMANT
ADVISORY COUNCIL
AND PORTMORE JOINT 2ND CLAIMANT
CITIZENS ASSOCIATION
AND MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT 1 RESPONDENT
AND WORKS
C; AND THEATTORNEYGENERAL 2ND RESPONDENT
OF JAMAICA
Lord Anthony Gifford Q.C. and Miss C. Hamilton instructed by Gifford,
Thompson & Bright for the Claimants.
Mr. Michael Hylton Q.C. along with Mr. P. Foster, Miss A. Lindsay and
Forbes, Millicent v The Attorney General
IN 'THE SLIPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN THE FULL COURT
CLAIM NO. 20041HCV - 01 386
BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MISS JUSTICE GLORIA SMITH
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAHADEV DUKHARAN
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROY JONES
BETWEEN MILLICENT FORBES CLAIMANT
AND THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF JAMAICA DEFENDANT
Richard Small an! D avid Wong-Ken instructed by Wong Ken & Co for the Claimant Mrs. Nicole ~osteh~useanyd Miss Carlene Larmond for the Defendant
Heard: Februarv 21 and 24,2005
G. SMITH, J.
Giguere, Martin v Government of the United States of America and Commissioner of Correctional Services
Extradition – proceedings before magistrate – Duty of magistrate – Test for committal – Whether magistrate obliged to conduct meaningful judicial proceedings – Need for proceedings to be conducted fairly – Whether arrest in good faith - Extradition – Delay in making request – Meaning of unjust or oppressive – Habeas corpus application – Review of order for committal – Role of the reviewing court – Whether to discharge from custody.
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 3