IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JLDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C.L. 199211 032 i
BETWEEN ISLAND BUILDERS PLAINTIFF
CONTRACTORS AND REAL
ESTATE LIMITED
AND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DEFENDANT
Mr. A. Irving instructed by Vacianna & Whittingharn for the plaintiff
Mr. Carlton Melbourne for the defendants
Heard: 24th, 25th. 26th May. !4th June. 2000 and 16' January 2001
GLORIA SMITH, J.
The plaintiff Island Builders Contractors and Real Estate Limited

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA 
IN COMMON LAW 
SUIT NO. C.L. 1998lH037
4
BETWEEN VANROY HUNTER PLAINTIFF ~
A ND OLIVE CARTER DEFENDANT ~
cj Dr. Adolph Edwards for the plaintiff
Mr. K. Williams instructed by Haughton & Associates for the ~dfendant I
I
L'
Heard: June 8,& 9, 2000 ; January 29 & 31,
February 1,9& 20.2001
GLORIA SMITH, J. ~ -.-
The plaintiff Mr. Vanroy Hunter's Claim dated the 6Ih March 1998 is
. . J
against the defendant Olive Carter for:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C.L. C.37111993
BETWEEN TREVOR CLARKE PLAINTIFF
' -\, L AND NATIONAL WATER
COMMISSION lST DEFENDANT
AND KENNETH HEWITT 2ND DEFENDANT
C AND VERNON SMITH 3RD DEFENDANT
CJ Mr. Terrence Williams & Miss Arlene Gaynor instructed by Mr. Jeremy
Palmer for the Plaintiff.
c I
Mrs. Ursula Khan & Mr. Charles Campbell instructed by Khan & Khan for
the 1 " & 2nd Defendants.
Heard: lgTHN ovember, 1999,5t h , 6th ,& 7" June, 2000

IN THE S WREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA 

IN COMMON LAW 

SUITNO. C.L. 1998/D155 
I BETWEEN DONALD DUNCANSON lST PLAINTIFF i
AND MARVA DUNCANSON 2NDP LAINTIFF ~
AND ISSA TRUST & MERCHANT DEFENDANT
BANK LIMITED
Mr. Ransford Braharn instructed by Messrs. Livingston, Alexander & Levy ~ 1
for the Plaintiff. ~'
Mr. John Vassell Q.C . & Miss Y. Whitely instructed by Messrs. Dunn, Cox 1
Orrett & Ashenheim for the Defendant. 1' II
Ci

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
'IN COMMON LAW
CLAIM C.L. 2002/E020
n
BETWEEN EUGENNIE EBANKS CLAIMANT
AND BETTING GAMING AND
LOTTERIES COMMISSION DEFENDANT
Mr. David Henry for the Claimant instructed by Mrs. Winsome Marsh.
Dr. Lloyd Barnett and Mr. Frank Williams for the Defendant.
HEARD: November 6 and 10,2003
G. SMITH, J.
1. The Claimant, Miss Eugennie Ebanks was employed to the
Defendant, the Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Commission, as

IN THE SWREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

CLAIM NO. C.L. F036 of 2001

BETWEEN LOCKSLEY FRANCIS CLAIMANT

AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 ST DEFENDANT

AND

IAN YOLNG

AND JOSEPH DAVIS

2ND DEFENDANT

3RD DEFENDANT

Mr. Lawrence Haynes for the Claimant

Miss Katherine Francis and Miss A. Richards instructed by Director of State

Proceedings for the Defendants.

HEARD: 5th February, 29th, 3oth March and 9'h November, 2004

G. SMITH, J.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAIC

CLAIM NO. HCV 1085 OF 2005

BETWEEN PORTMORE CITIZENS 1 CLAIMANT

ADVISORY COUNCIL

AND PORTMORE JOINT 2ND CLAIMANT

CITIZENS ASSOCIATION

AND MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT 1 RESPONDENT

AND WORKS

C; AND THEATTORNEYGENERAL 2ND RESPONDENT

OF JAMAICA

Lord Anthony Gifford Q.C. and Miss C. Hamilton instructed by Gifford,

Thompson & Bright for the Claimants.

Mr. Michael Hylton Q.C. along with Mr. P. Foster, Miss A. Lindsay and

IN 'THE SLIPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

IN THE FULL COURT

CLAIM NO. 20041HCV - 01 386

BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MISS JUSTICE GLORIA SMITH

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAHADEV DUKHARAN

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROY JONES

BETWEEN MILLICENT FORBES CLAIMANT

AND THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF JAMAICA DEFENDANT

Richard Small an! D avid Wong-Ken instructed by Wong Ken & Co for the Claimant Mrs. Nicole ~osteh~useanyd Miss Carlene Larmond for the Defendant

Heard: Februarv 21 and 24,2005

G. SMITH, J.

Extradition – proceedings before magistrate – Duty of magistrate – Test for committal – Whether magistrate obliged to conduct meaningful judicial proceedings – Need for proceedings to be conducted fairly – Whether arrest in good faith - Extradition – Delay in making request – Meaning of unjust or oppressive – Habeas corpus application – Review of order for committal – Role of the reviewing court – Whether to discharge from custody.