Edwards, Claudette v Quest Security Services Ltd

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF J

CIVIL DIVISION

CLAIM NO. 2005 HCV 01124

BETWEEN

AND

CLAUDETTE EDWARDS CLAIMANT

QUEST SECURITY

SERVICES LTD DEFENDANT

I N CHAMBERS I

Mr. Rudolph Smellie and Miss Tamika Harris for the claimant I

F -

L' Mr. J a l i l Dabdoub instructed by Dabdoub, Dabdoub and Company f o r

I

I

the defendant I

September 15 and 20, 2005 I

PRIVITY OF CONTRACT, DECLARATION, LOCUS STAND1 AND

APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT CLAIM

SYKES J

1 Quest Security Services Limited (Quest) is asking the court to

strike out this claim in which Miss Edwards is seeking declarations C that the purported amendment of a contract between Quest and

Guardian Life Limited (Guardian) is invalid or in the alternative

that the purported change of beneficiary by Miss Lettera

Thompson was procured by undue influence. Quest says that Miss

Edwards is not a party to the contract and therefore cannot bring

this or any claim concerning the contract. I should indicate that

the claim against Guardian Life Limited, who was named as the

second defendant, was struck out on September 9, 2005. I have

set out the claim form in its amended form before the striking out

of the case against Guardian.