Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Case Number
2004 HCV 2172
Year
Date of Delivery

I N THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

CLAIM N O . 2004 HCV 2172 7

BETWEEN

AND

ANDREW EBANKS CLAIMANT

JEPHTHER McCLYMONT DEFENDANT

Janet Taylor i n s t r u c t e d by Taylor, Deacon and James for the

claimant

Hugh Wilson for the defendant

February 5, 6 and March 8, 2007

REFUSAL OF APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT, RULE 39.7 OF THE

(1 C I V I L PROCEDURE RULES, ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, ASSESSMENT OF

DAMAGES, LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY

SYKES J.

1. Mr. McClymont is a recording and performing a r t i s t . He has been

sued by Mr. Andrew Ebanks in respect of injuries received by Mr.

Ebanks when he was struck by a motor vehicle driven by Mr.

McClymont. The defendant is absent. When the m a t t e r came up for

t r i a l on February 5, 2007, Mr. Hugh Wilson, counsel for the

defendant, indicated t h a t Mr. McClymont was out of Jamaica. Mr.

McClymont was i n Australia. I granted an adjournment t o February 6,

2007. On t h a t date, Mr. Wilson renewed h i s application f o r an

adjournment. He said t h a t t h e defendant was s t i l l in Australia. I

declined t o grant a f u r t h e r adjournment; entered judgment f o r the

claimant and proceeded to the assessment of damages.

g, Reasons for refusing adjournment

2. Mr. Wilson in applying f o r t h e adjournment on both days relied on

rule 39.7 (1) o f t h e Civil Procedure Rules ("CPR") which reads:

The judge may adjourn a t r i a l on such terms as the judge thinks

just.

3. The rule is cast i n very wide terms b u t t h a t does not mean t h a t it

has no boundaries. When exercising any discretion under the CPR, a

judge must t a k e i n t o account rule 1.1 which requires t h a t t h e matter

be d e a l t with j u s t l y . I t emphasises t h a t dealing with t h e case j u s t l y

includes, ensuring t h a t t h e case is dealt with expeditiously, f a i r l y and

a l l o t t i n g t o it an appropriate share of the court's resources while

taking into account t h e need t o allot resources t o other cases.