The Hon. Mr. Justice Lennox Campbell

Negligence – Proximity or neighbourhood – Duty of care – General Duty on occupiers in relation to hazard on their land – Extent of duty – Expert evidence – Nuisance – Substantial or trifling

False Imprisonment – Taking Control over the Claimant – Proof in Special Damages – Aggravated Damages – Handicap on the Labour Market

Family Property - Husband and wife - Family Home - Family Law Reform -

Mischief for Correction - Equal Share Rule - Whether Application Unreasonable

and Unjust - Relevance of Contributions - Property (Rights of Spouses) Act 2004,

SS 6,7 and 14

Interlocutory Injunction – Main Road Act – Abandoned Roadway – Statutory Requirement for Ownership – Arguable Case – Balance of Convenience

Negligence – Motor Vehicle Collision – Inevitable Accident – No Need for Specific Pleading Definition – Apportionment of Liability

Property Right of Spouses Act S. 13 – Application for an Unequal Share of Family Home – Family Law Reform – Equal Share Rule – Whether Equal Share Unreason-able and Unjust – Relevance of Contributions – Statutory Entitlement S. 6

Judicial review - Renewal of application - Test for leave to apply for judicial review  -  Delay in applying for judicial review  - Whether remedy would be granted even if application for leave to apply judicial review granted - Whether criminal process provides adequate means of redress - Whether applicant should be granted if criminal process provides adequate remedy - Contractor General Act - Sections 4, 15, 18, 29 of the Act - Parts 26, 56 and 73 of Civil Procedure Rules - Whether application in time - Whether court has power to extend time to renew application.

Judicial review - Application of leave - The more serious allegations require stronger evidence - Amending legislation - Whether inconsistent or repugnant public body definition - Source - Public element - Wednesbury unreasonable